Fill Out a Valid Da 2166 9 1 Form

1. Incomplete Information: Failing to fill out all required fields can lead to delays. Ensure every section, especially the administrative data, is fully completed.

2. Incorrect Dates: Entering the wrong dates for the period covered or the counseling dates can cause confusion. Double-check all date entries for accuracy.

3. Missing Signatures: Omitting signatures from the rater, senior rater, or supplementary reviewer can render the form invalid. All required signatures must be included before submission.

4. Wrong Email Format: Providing an incorrect email address can hinder communication. Ensure that the email addresses for all raters are in the correct .gov or .mil format.

5. Neglecting Comments: Not providing comments where required, especially in performance evaluations, can weaken the report. Take the time to add thoughtful comments that reflect the rated NCO's performance.

6. Ignoring Privacy Guidelines: Failing to adhere to the privacy act statement can lead to unauthorized disclosures. Always be mindful of the sensitive information included in the form.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an important document used for evaluating non-commissioned officers (NCOs) in the U.S. Army. However, it is often accompanied by several other forms and documents that play a crucial role in the evaluation process. Below is a list of these additional forms and documents, along with a brief description of each.

• DA Form 2166-9-2: This form is used for evaluating NCOs in the rank of Staff Sergeant and above. It provides a comprehensive assessment of their performance and potential, similar to the 2166-9-1 but tailored for higher ranks.
• DA Form 4856: Known as the Developmental Counseling Form, this document is used to record counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. It helps ensure that soldiers receive guidance on their performance and areas for improvement.
• DA Form 705: This form records a soldier's Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) results. It is essential for evaluating physical readiness, which is a key component of overall performance.
• DA Form 5500/5501: These forms are used to record body fat measurements for soldiers who exceed height and weight standards. Maintaining proper physical standards is crucial in the evaluation process.
• DA Form 201: The Military Personnel Records Jacket, or MPRJ, contains important information about a soldier's career, including assignments, awards, and disciplinary actions. This form provides context for evaluations.
• DA Form 2627: This form is used for non-judicial punishment under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). It documents any disciplinary actions taken against a soldier, which can impact their evaluation.
• DA Form 4187: The Personnel Action Form is used to request changes in a soldier's status, such as reassignment or promotion. It is often part of the documentation required for evaluations and career progression.
• Arizona University Application form: This form is essential for students applying for undergraduate admission, and for more information on the application process, you can visit AZ Forms Online.
• DA Form 3349: This form is used to document a soldier's physical profile, which indicates any limitations on their duty performance due to medical conditions. It is relevant for assessing overall capability.
• DA Form 67-9: The Officer Evaluation Report (OER) is similar to the NCO evaluation report but is specifically designed for officers. It assesses their performance and potential in a comparable manner.
• AR 623-3: This Army regulation outlines the policies and procedures for the evaluation of soldiers. It provides guidance on the evaluation process, ensuring consistency and fairness across the board.

Understanding these forms and documents is essential for anyone involved in the evaluation process within the Army. They work together to provide a complete picture of a soldier's performance, potential, and overall readiness. Proper documentation ensures that evaluations are fair, comprehensive, and beneficial for both the soldiers and the Army as a whole.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is similar to the DA Form 4856, which is used for Developmental Counseling. Both forms serve to document an individual’s performance and development within the Army. The DA Form 4856 focuses on counseling sessions, outlining the soldier’s strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. Like the DA Form 2166-9-1, it requires signatures from both the counselor and the soldier, ensuring mutual acknowledgment of the discussed points. Each document aims to promote professional growth and accountability in the soldier’s career.

Another comparable document is the DA Form 67-9, the Officer Evaluation Report (OER). The OER evaluates the performance of officers in a manner similar to the NCO Evaluation Report. Both forms assess leadership qualities, professional attributes, and overall potential. The OER includes ratings and comments from both a rater and a senior rater, similar to the structure found in the DA Form 2166-9-1. Both documents ultimately influence career progression and promotion opportunities.

The DA Form 1059, which is the Academic Evaluation Report, also shares similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1. This form assesses soldiers' performance during training courses, focusing on their academic achievements and competencies. Like the NCO Evaluation Report, the DA Form 1059 provides a structured assessment that includes ratings and comments from instructors. Both forms contribute to a soldier’s overall evaluation and career development within the Army.

The DA Form 250, known as the Performance Work Statement (PWS), is another document that shares a common purpose with the DA Form 2166-9-1. While the PWS is primarily used for contract management, it also outlines expected performance standards and deliverables, akin to the performance evaluation sections of the NCO Evaluation Report. Both documents aim to ensure clarity in performance expectations and accountability, whether for individuals or contracted services.

If you're seeking to understand the intricacies of making decisions for a minor, the form outlining the Power of Attorney for a Child is an essential resource that provides the necessary legal framework for parents and guardians.

Lastly, the DA Form 3150, which is the Noncommissioned Officer Development Program (NCODP) Record, resembles the DA Form 2166-9-1 in its focus on professional development. The NCODP Record tracks a soldier’s participation in development activities and training, similar to how the NCO Evaluation Report assesses performance and potential. Both documents emphasize the importance of continuous growth and development in a soldier's career, reinforcing the Army's commitment to fostering leadership and excellence.

When filling out the DA 2166 9 1 form, it is essential to approach the task with care and attention to detail. Below are seven important things to do and avoid during this process.

• Do ensure accuracy: Double-check all entries for correctness, including names, dates, and identification numbers.
• Do provide complete information: Fill in all required fields to avoid delays in processing.
• Do use clear and concise language: When describing duties and responsibilities, clarity is vital.
• Do verify email addresses: Ensure that all email addresses provided are current and correct, as this facilitates communication.
• Don't rush through the form: Take your time to review each section thoroughly before submission.
• Don't leave any fields blank: If a section does not apply, indicate that it is not applicable instead of leaving it empty.
• Don't forget to sign: Ensure that all required signatures are completed, as this confirms the accuracy of the information provided.

By adhering to these guidelines, individuals can help ensure that the evaluation process runs smoothly and effectively.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, there are several important points to keep in mind. This form is essential for evaluating Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) and requires careful attention to detail.

• Administrative Data: Ensure that all personal information, including name, SSN, rank, and unit details, is accurately filled out in Part I. Mistakes here can lead to complications later.
• Rater and Senior Rater Information: The signatures of both the rater and senior rater are crucial. Their names, ranks, and email addresses must be provided clearly to validate the evaluation.
• Performance Evaluation: In Part IV, provide specific comments regarding the rated NCO's performance across various attributes, such as character, presence, and intellect. Use clear examples to support your assessments.
• Counseling Dates: Document all counseling dates accurately. This shows that the rated NCO has received feedback and guidance throughout the evaluation period.
• Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO’s signature indicates that they have seen the report and understand the contents. It does not imply agreement with the evaluation.
• Potential Assessment: The senior rater must assess the rated NCO’s potential compared to peers. This is a critical component that can impact future assignments and promotions.
• Enclosures: If there are any additional documents or enclosures, make sure to note them in the appropriate section. This can include training certificates or other relevant materials.
• Review Process: Familiarize yourself with the appeals process outlined in AR 623-3. Understanding this can help address any concerns regarding the evaluation.

Completing the DA 2166-9-1 form accurately and thoroughly is vital for ensuring a fair and comprehensive evaluation of NCOs. Each section plays a significant role in the overall assessment and future career opportunities.